1 November 2022

Seeing vertical mergers through a different lens? Implications from EssilorLuxottica / GrandVision

In 2021, the European Commission concluded its in-depth review of EssilorLuxottica/GrandVision, in which it required structural remedies to approve the transaction. Contrary to previous vertical mergers, the Commission’s concerns did not entail a refusal to supply downstream rivals (total input foreclosure); rather, its concerns were exclusively focused on a more gradual theory of harm, related to the changes in pricing incentives that the merger could bring about. Such changes in pricing incentives were measured with vertical price pressure tests, which were used by the Commission for the first time in this investigation.

This Brief discusses the Commission’s assessment of this case and its possible implications for future vertical merger investigations.

Downloadpdf (90 KB)

Our experience and expertise means our clients have the best chance of success before competition authorities and courts.

We have unrivalled experience across the full range of issues presented by competition law and related associated litigation.


All Articles
  • Article26/02/2024
    Trouble in store(s): The CMA’s new approach to local mergers post-MAGs
  • Article20/11/2023
    RBB response to South African Commission’s draft guidelines for public interest in merger control